The Role of a Welding Inspector

The role of a welding inspector begins well before welding starts, continues throughout the welding process, involves a series of post-weld activities, and concludes only after the proper documentation of the results. As an integral part of the quality system, inspection activities are defined in the inspection and test plan, which clearly outlines all requirements. In many cases, the inspector is also responsible for preparing documentation that ensures traceability of individual components and the corresponding manufacturing activities.

Before welding begins, the inspector must ensure that the appropriate materials are being used and that the shop has approved the welding procedure and qualified welders accordingly. Written procedures and competent operators are essential for producing high-quality welded components, but the actual execution of the weld is also critically important for the inspector. Once the inspector verifies that everything is in order and welding can commence, their task becomes monitoring and oversight. At this stage, the inspector must focus on two key aspects: ensuring adherence to written procedures and identifying any physical signs of potential defects in the product.

The inspector’s responsibilities include verifying the base metal and welding consumables, ensuring correct fit-up and joint preparation, and monitoring the welding operation itself. Upon completion of welding, a subsequent series of inspection activities is carried out. This begins with executing the inspection program in accordance with the approved procedure, overseeing the inspection process and quality control, and selecting specific welds for further non-destructive testing or mechanical testing.

Heat treatment (preheating, interpass heating, or post-weld heat treatment) can be a critically important parameter in welding production, and it is often the inspector’s responsibility to ensure it is carried out properly. Heat treatment must be performed in accordance with approved written procedures. To ensure reliable results, the inspector must have sufficient knowledge of the relevant technology, equipment, and reporting requirements.

Interpretation of radiograph (Part 3).

Artefacts.
Pressure marks (crimp marks).
Produced by careless film handling – if the film is crimped or buckled either
before or after exposure crescent-shaped images in the processed radiograph
will result. Light marks indicate crimping before exposure, dark marks crimping
after exposure but before film processing.
It is usually possible to identify crimp marks by viewing the film in reflected
light. They should appear as indentations in the surface of the film. Lead
Continue reading →

Interpretation of Radiographs (Part 2).

Film quality.
The success of radiographic interpretation is dependent upon the quality of the
film presented. If the film does not meet the minimum applicable standards for
quality then it should be rejected and reshot. The manufacturer’s interpreter
may, for economic reasons, not be inclined to reject radiographs which do not
meet the minimum quality standards. Therefore any third party viewing the
radiographs should be extremely careful to correctly assess the quality of the
radiographs prior to endorsing the relevant report, otherwise they will be open
to criticism should the film become the subject of any subsequent legal inquiry.
Continue reading →

Interpretation of Radiographs (Part 1).

Interpretation of Radiographs
Introduction
Interpretation of radiographs is a skill only gained through long experience.
The interpretation of a radiograph should not be confused with the acceptance
or rejection of a component. The radiograph must first be interpreted and any
defects observed assessed against the applicable standard. A weld or casting
must be accepted on its merits or rejected for its faults and should neither be
accepted nor rejected due to difficulties encountered in the interpretation of
radiographs. Any radiograph not meeting code requirements with regard to
radiographic quality must be rejected.
Continue reading →

The definition of the technological properties concept and the requirements for it. The technical and economic indicators of power sources. The criterion for selecting power sources for welding.

When selecting power sources for welding, take into account technological and economic indicators. The choice of sources will ultimately be based on economic calculations, but this economic calculation will be performed from the set of sources that satisfy the first two criteria. Therefore, it is necessary to know about these two criteria.

The power source is considered to be technological if it provides:

  1. the arc stability (estimated by the coefficient of stability– КУ);
  2. the arc elasticity;
  3. the minimum level of spattering of the electrode metal.

The arc elasticity is the ability of a stable arc to burn without breaks in its elongation.

Continue reading →